Groups such as the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC),  Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC),  Construction Industry Roundtable (CIRT), the National Federation of Independent Affairs (NFIB), the National Black Chamber of Commerce(U.S. Chamber of Commerce) have actively opposed the use of PLA, particularly for government projects. These groups have questioned the application of such agreements through litigation, lobbying and public relations campaigns.  Opponents of the PLA supported Bush`s executive order, which prohibits government-mandated LBAs, and argued that between 2001 and 2008, when the executive order was in effect, no federal project had experienced significant work problems, delays or cost overruns due to the absence of ALP.  According to the applicants, who oppose THE ACCORDS, the agreements restrict the recruitment and work practices of contractors and may result in higher costs for project owners.  One of their objections to the PLA is that the agreements require contractors to contribute to union performance plans and comply with the labour rules of trade unions.  In addition, they oppose the use of LDCs to limit the hiring of projects to construction workers who have been chosen by unions through tenant unions, and argue that this does not improve the quality of workers, since all those who are admitted to a trade have at least the same level of education and qualification. , whether or not they belong to a union.  The use of a project employment contract generally results in cost overruns and higher construction costs for taxpayers. Independent contractors from qualified trade unions who wish to offer cheaper offers and workers who wish to work without unions will be excluded from the project. However, politicians and government officials continue to impose project work contracts to reward union officials who finance and maintain their political campaigns in power. Opponents spread misinformation about THE PLA. The truth is that THE PLA are good business, and that is why they receive ongoing support from all parties and are used in public and private projects.
PTAs, also known as community workforce agreements, are pre-existing collective lease agreements that standardize contractual terms through various craft contracts, prevent delays and provide access to a steady supply of safe and highly skilled labour by investing in the next generation of construction workers. Government-mandated ATPs discouraged contractors from competing with construction projects and winning taxpayer-funded contracts. Contracts for work subject to state-mandated PPPs are almost always awarded exclusively to unionized contractors and their union staff. Less competition and the archaic and inefficient rules of union work and feathered beds required by THE PLA unnecessarily increase the cost of construction projects. As a general rule, projects subject to government-imposed APAs are governed by Davis-Bacon federal laws or by state and municipal wage laws that require the payment of “dominant” wage rates at the local level to employees of contractors and subcontractors working on skilled construction projects. For projects subject to the Federal Davis-bacon Act, the Wage-Hour (WHD) division of the U.S. Department of Labor is responsible for conducting investigations to determine the rates of pay applicable to these projects. The rates required are generally union collective bargaining, although some trades are sometimes determined by a mixed rate of market rates and trade union agreements.